← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Pettinger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-03-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 61 2 10 12 0.197 0.0379 0.0403 0.1239 0.1318
2003-04 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 42 2 15 17 0.405 0.0779 0.0792 0.2551 0.2595
2004-05 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 61 3 20 23 0.377 0.0726 0.0704 0.2375 0.2304
2005-06 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 56 4 29 33 0.589 0.1134 0.1042 0.3713 0.3410
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2008-09 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 26 0 2 2 0.077
2007-08 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 20 0 2 2 0.100
2006-07 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 23 1 3 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2006-07 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+103.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12859
Defenseman overall
#1263
Defenseman born in 1985
#936
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2015-16
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.