IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

P.J. Conlon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 57 6 13 19 0.333 0.1297 0.1261 0.4861 0.4727
2015-16 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 57 21 31 52 0.912 0.3551 0.3263 1.3304 1.2224
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 25 5 8 13 0.520
2018-19 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 26 6 11 17 0.654
2017-18 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 24 1 4 5 0.208
2016-17 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 24 3 6 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2016-17 · Amherst
+77.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13430
Forward overall
#474
Forward born in 1995
#1132
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Peters
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Seltenreich
New England · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Eruzione
Salve Regina · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.