IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Porter Martone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-10-26 Country: Canada
2025 NHL Draft Round 1, Pick #6  ·  Philadelphia Flyers Philadelphia Flyers
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 — OHL 61 19 16 35 0.574 0.3330 0.3737 1.4704 1.6502
2023-24 Brampton Steelheads OHL 60 33 38 71 1.183 0.6867 0.7378 3.0322 3.2578
2024-25 Brampton Steelheads OHL 57 37 61 98 1.719 0.9977 1.0204 4.4057 4.5061
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Michigan D1 BigTen — 35 25 25 50 1.429
2025-26 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 35 25 25 50 1.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.90
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.43
2025-26 · Michigan
+58.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Taylor Cammarata
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
1.02 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Kloos
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.97 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.