IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyson Doucette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 20 5 6 11 0.550 0.1399 0.1399 0.2282 0.2282
2021-22 Aurora Tigers OJHL 24 7 7 14 0.583 0.1752 0.1848 0.3993 0.4212
2022-23 Sarnia Sting OHL 58 4 4 8 0.138 0.0800 0.0788 0.3534 0.3482
2023-24 Sarnia Sting OHL 68 23 23 46 0.676 0.3926 0.3681 1.7335 1.6251
2024-25 Sarnia Sting OHL 65 20 16 36 0.554 0.3214 0.2847 1.4191 1.2572
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 35 5 5 10 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2025-26 · Colgate
+4.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16768
Forward overall
#840
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Hanson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Stark
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Stuart Stefan
Castleton · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.