← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Keaveney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-22 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Babson
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 24 3 2 5 0.208 0.0413 0.0413 0.0949 0.0949
2023-24 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 28 8 12 20 0.714 0.1415 0.1415 0.3254 0.3254
2024-25 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 23 11 14 25 1.087 0.2153 0.2153 0.4952 0.4952
2025-26 South Shore Kings NCDC 50 16 32 48 0.960 0.3914 0.3863 0.7716 0.7615
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
40%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8667
Forward overall
#267
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Babson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.44
actual FR PPG at Babson
0.24
actual FR PPG at Babson
1.00
actual FR PPG at Babson
0.44
actual FR PPG at Babson

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2015-16
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2008-09
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2015-16
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.