← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ivan Zelenov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-02 Country: Austria
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Connecticut College
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 40 10 11 21 0.525 0.2140 0.2213 0.4220 0.4364
2025-26 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 43 9 29 38 0.884 0.3603 0.3532 0.7103 0.6963
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
48%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7280
Forward overall
#198
Forward born in 2006
#157
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Connecticut College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.78
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
0.79
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
0.30
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
0.61
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College

D2/3 Comparables

Johnson & Wales · 2013-14
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2016-17
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2008-09
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.