IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Paul Capozzi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 45 15 23 38 0.844 0.2370 0.2396 0.6954 0.7031
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC — 23 11 7 18 0.783
2019-20 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 25 7 14 21 0.840
2018-19 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 24 4 9 13 0.542
2017-18 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 25 10 9 19 0.760
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2017-18 · Connecticut College
+270.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22769
Forward overall
#1032
Forward born in 1997
#52
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeff Olitch
Wentworth · 2004-05
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Caprio
Becker · 2005-06
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Emmond Bell
Norwich · 2006-07
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.