IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Louis Sweenor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-11-12 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
SUNY Plattsburgh
SUNYAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 NY Dynamo NCDC 47 6 26 32 0.681 0.2776 0.2829 0.5473 0.5577
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1698
Defenseman overall
#259
Defenseman born in 2006
#206
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Lowney
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

SUNY Plattsburgh Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jared Docking
0.74
actual FR PPG at SUNY Plattsburgh
David McNab
0.75
actual FR PPG at SUNY Plattsburgh
Cam Owens
0.65
actual FR PPG at SUNY Plattsburgh
Nicholas Belger
0.90
actual FR PPG at SUNY Plattsburgh

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Stewart
Marian · 2012-13
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Malcolm Cardwell
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.