← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eli Velepec Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-11 Country: USA
Wesleyan
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 25 0 1 1 0.040 0.0079 0.0079 0.0182 0.0182
2022-23 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 25 2 5 7 0.280 0.0555 0.0555 0.1276 0.1276
2023-24 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 23 8 8 16 0.696 0.1378 0.1378 0.3170 0.3170
2024-25 South Shore Kings NCDC 51 13 18 31 0.608 0.2478 0.2472 0.4885 0.4873
2025-26 South Shore Kings NCDC 54 4 22 26 0.481 0.1963 0.1853 0.3870 0.3652
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16332
Forward overall
#853
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Wesleyan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.46
actual FR PPG at Wesleyan
0.00
actual FR PPG at Wesleyan
0.73
actual FR PPG at Wesleyan
0.00
actual FR PPG at Wesleyan

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Albertus Magnus · 2023-24
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.