← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Baksay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-01-17 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
UMass Boston
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 NMH NE-Prep 32 15 12 27 0.844 0.1672 0.1672 0.3844 0.3844
2024-25 NMH NE-Prep 31 22 18 40 1.290 0.2556 0.2556 0.5879 0.5879
2025-26 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 44 13 11 24 0.545 0.2224 0.2175 0.4385 0.4289
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
55%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13995
Forward overall
#543
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

UMass Boston Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

1.00
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston
1.12
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston
0.24
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston
0.39
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2023-24
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.