IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Gricus Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-06-29 Country: USA
Arcadia
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 28 1 5 6 0.214 0.0874 0.0917 0.1715 0.1799
2024-25 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 48 2 13 15 0.312 0.1274 0.1280 0.2501 0.2512
2025-26 — NCDC 40 0 8 8 0.200 0.0815 0.0775 0.1600 0.1521
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11515
Defenseman overall
#2349
Defenseman born in 2005
#1270
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Arcadia Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nathaniel McFarlane
0.22
actual FR PPG at Arcadia
Wesley Sweitzer
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arcadia
Connor Williams
0.38
actual FR PPG at Arcadia
Sawyer Smith
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arcadia

D2/3 Comparables

Émile Lévesque
Salem State · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrik Peltola
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Cummings
Misericordia · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.