← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrik Peltola Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-26 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 17 1 6 7 0.412 0.1679 0.1583 0.3310 0.3120
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SR 23 4 3 7 0.304
2021-22 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC JR 20 1 1 2 0.100
2020-21 Anna Maria D1 MASCAC SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Anna Maria D1 MASCAC FR 24 1 8 9 0.375
2019-20 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC FR 24 1 8 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2019-20 · Anna Maria
+176.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7858
Forward overall
#352
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2024-25
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2022-23
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.