IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Conte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-04-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 7 0 2 2 0.286 0.1593 0.1654 0.2310 0.2399
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 9 1 1 2 0.222
2024-25 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 9 1 1 2 0.222
2023-24 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 9 1 1 2 0.222
2022-23 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 9 1 1 2 0.222
2021-22 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 9 1 1 2 0.222
2020-21 Canisius ACHA_D1 — — 9 1 1 2 0.222

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Parker Gnos
Saint John's · 2020-21
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Conner Couet
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2019-20
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jan Velich
Elmira · 2002-03
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.