← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-11-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 28 1 5 6 0.214 0.0377 0.0380 0.0491 0.0495
2018-19 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 12 3 2 5 0.417 0.0732 0.0704 0.0955 0.0919
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Castleton D3 SR 22 0 2 2 0.091
2007-08 Castleton D3 JR 18 1 0 1 0.056
2006-07 Castleton D3 SO 22 1 4 5 0.227
2006-07 Franklin Pierce D2 SR 23 0 1 1 0.043
2005-06 Castleton D3 FR 26 1 6 7 0.269
2005-06 Franklin Pierce D2 JR 22 1 4 5 0.227
2004-05 Franklin Pierce D2 SO 24 0 4 4 0.167
2003-04 Franklin Pierce D2 FR 24 3 5 8 0.333

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
60%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#55578
Forward overall
#3386
Forward born in 1999
#1131
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2001-02
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2015-16
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.