← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Elliott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-11-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Soo Eagles NOJHL 29 0 4 4 0.138 0.0351 0.0351 0.0572 0.0572
2017-18 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 30 2 5 7 0.233 0.0769 0.0737 0.0794 0.0761
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D1 JR 4 1 1 2 0.500
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 4 1 1 2 0.500
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D1 SO 4 1 0 1 0.250
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 4 1 0 1 0.250
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D1 FR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2018-19 · Gustavus Adolphus
+203.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19796
Defenseman overall
#2570
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2023-24
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2009-10
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.