← New Search ↗ Social Card

Urban Podrekar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-02-14 Country: Slovenia
Ferris State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Niagara IceDogs OHL 62 3 19 22 0.355 0.2053 0.2032 0.9117 0.9023
2024-25 Flint Firebirds OHL 65 10 17 27 0.415 0.2403 0.2254 1.0674 1.0013
2025-26 Flint Firebirds OHL 67 11 39 50 0.746 0.4317 0.3832 1.9176 1.7024
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2858
Defenseman overall
#709
Defenseman born in 2005
#644
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Ferris State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

QMJHL 2015-16
0.22
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
NAHL 2018-19
0.43
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
NAHL 2023-24
0.12
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
AJHL 2022-23
0.08
actual FR PPG at Ferris State

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2014-15
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.030 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.