← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Evennou Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-07-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Glacier Nationals NA3HL 42 4 13 17 0.405 0.0508 0.0577 0.1278 0.1451
2016-17 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 50 4 12 16 0.320 0.1176 0.1228 0.3378 0.3528
2017-18 USHL 55 3 10 13 0.236 0.1395 0.1344 0.7100 0.6842
2018-19 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 53 16 24 40 0.755 0.2773 0.2635 0.7966 0.7568
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Ferris State D1 CCHA SR 35 1 14 15 0.429
2021-22 Ferris State D1 CCHA JR 36 4 8 12 0.333
2020-21 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 25 1 9 10 0.400
2019-20 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 35 1 14 15 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2019-20 · Ferris State
+114.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6106
Defenseman overall
#1291
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2009-10
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2024-25
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.