IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Wang Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Oakville Blades OJHL 44 2 6 8 0.182 0.0446 0.0505 0.1251 0.1417
2022-23 Oakville Blades OJHL 49 25 21 46 0.939 0.2301 0.2489 0.6462 0.6991
2023-24 Flint Firebirds OHL 61 4 7 11 0.180 0.1043 0.1059 0.4721 0.4794
2024-25 Flint Firebirds OHL 68 15 13 28 0.412 0.2382 0.2296 1.0783 1.0394
2025-26 Flint Firebirds OHL 32 5 5 10 0.312 0.1808 0.1652 0.8182 0.7475
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 RIT D1 AHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31665
Forward overall
#1869
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andréas Fleutot
Westfield State · 2022-23
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Simopoulos
Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Obssuth
Wentworth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.