IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Newlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Philadelphia Hockey Club NCDC 47 14 10 24 0.511 0.2847 0.2792 0.4129 0.4050
2022-23 Philadelphia Hockey Club EHL 33 8 17 25 0.758 0.2666 0.2541 0.3715 0.3541
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 28 3 11 14 0.500
2024-25 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 28 3 11 14 0.500
2023-24 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 28 3 11 14 0.500
2022-23 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 28 3 11 14 0.500
2021-22 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 28 3 11 14 0.500
2020-21 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 28 3 11 14 0.500

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25402
Forward overall
#1428
Forward born in 2002
#822
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gene Falsetto
Elmira · 2006-07
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Pahos
St. Scholastica · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
TJ Christensen
Bethel · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.