← New Search ↗ Social Card

Henry Hearon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Chicago Bulldogs NA3HL 44 1 12 13 0.295 0.0371 0.0378 0.0933 0.0951
2014-15 Chicago Bulldogs NA3HL 45 3 27 30 0.667 0.0837 0.0813 0.2105 0.2044
2015-16 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Elite 44 5 26 31 0.705 0.0650 0.0606 0.1613 0.1503
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Trine D1 NCHA SR 28 1 9 10 0.357
2019-20 Trine D3 NCHA 28 1 9 10 0.357
2018-19 Trine D1 NCHA JR 25 0 8 8 0.320
2018-19 Trine D3 NCHA 25 0 8 8 0.320
2017-18 Trine D3 NCHA 25 0 2 2 0.080
2016-17 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 22 7 4 11 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2016-17 · SUNY Morrisville
+669.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14170
Defenseman overall
#1814
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2022-23
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2016-17
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.