← New Search ↗ Social Card

Raphaël Gosselin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 35 4 6 10 0.286 0.1064 0.0980 0.4163 0.3833
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen JR 11 4 7 11 1.000
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 11 4 7 11 1.000
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen SO 27 8 9 17 0.630
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 27 8 9 17 0.630
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen FR 27 5 9 14 0.518
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 27 5 9 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2018-19 · Wisconsin-Stout
+518.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41484
Forward overall
#2035
Forward born in 1997
#2640
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2018-19
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2003-04
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.