IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Scimeca Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 28 2 3 5 0.179 0.0728 0.0770 0.1436 0.1520
2022-23 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 50 6 12 18 0.360 0.1468 0.1492 0.2894 0.2941
2023-24 — NCDC 33 10 9 19 0.576 0.2348 0.2253 0.4628 0.4441
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20875
Forward overall
#1083
Forward born in 2003
#712
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Isaac Baker
Concordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Harder
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Dolter
St. Olaf · 2017-18
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.