IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cullen McCormick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 41 5 9 14 0.342 0.1904 0.1896 0.2761 0.2750
2023-24 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 48 3 15 18 0.375 0.2091 0.1964 0.3032 0.2848
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 27 5 11 16 0.593
2024-25 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 27 5 11 16 0.593
2023-24 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 27 5 11 16 0.593
2022-23 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 27 5 11 16 0.593
2021-22 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 27 5 11 16 0.593
2020-21 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 27 5 11 16 0.593

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6571
Defenseman overall
#1601
Defenseman born in 2003
#934
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Inderieden
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2008-09
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Leonard
Castleton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady O'Connor
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.