IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Leonard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Richmond Generals USPHL-Elite 36 5 7 12 0.333 0.0586 0.0575 0.0764 0.0750
2015-16 Richmond Generals USPHL-Elite 44 8 23 31 0.705 0.1238 0.1157 0.1614 0.1509
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Castleton D1 — SR 24 2 3 5 0.208
2019-20 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 24 2 3 5 0.208
2018-19 Castleton D1 — JR 18 2 1 3 0.167
2018-19 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 18 2 1 3 0.167
2017-18 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 15 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#47299
Forward overall
#2050
Forward born in 1995
#609
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Jerzak
Elmira · 2024-25
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonathon Elliott
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2011-12
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Moody
Wisconsin-Stout · 2012-13
0.160 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.