IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathon Elliott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-04-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Navan Grads CCHL 62 14 24 38 0.613 0.1957 0.1875 0.4744 0.4546
2011-12 Navan Grads CCHL 62 15 22 37 0.597 0.1906 0.1729 0.4620 0.4191
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — SR 21 4 6 10 0.476
2014-15 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — JR 14 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — SO 23 6 5 11 0.478
2012-13 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — FR 4 0 1 1 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2012-13 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+63.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29342
Forward overall
#1027
Forward born in 1991
#788
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyler Campbell
Albertus Magnus · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason McAloon
Lake Forest · 2010-11
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaymus Stevenson
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.