← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Sparo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 49 8 9 17 0.347 0.1414 0.1414 0.2788 0.2788
2024-25 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 36 5 14 19 0.528 0.2152 0.2152 0.4242 0.4242
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 West Chester University ACHA_D1 34 15 8 23 0.676
2024-25 West Chester University ACHA_D1 34 15 8 23 0.676
2023-24 West Chester University ACHA_D1 34 15 8 23 0.676
2022-23 West Chester University ACHA_D1 34 15 8 23 0.676
2021-22 West Chester University ACHA_D1 34 15 8 23 0.676
2020-21 West Chester University ACHA_D1 34 15 8 23 0.676

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18335
Forward overall
#610
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2006-07
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2005-06
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.