← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Turkowitz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-10-18 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Elite 1 0 2 2 2.000 0.1846 0.2051 0.4580 0.5088
2023-24 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Elite 14 3 4 7 0.500 0.0461 0.0489 0.1145 0.1214
2024-25 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 45 12 13 25 0.556 0.1283 0.1389 0.2719 0.2945
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New York University ACHA_D1 25 0 1 1 0.040
2024-25 New York University ACHA_D1 25 0 1 1 0.040
2023-24 New York University ACHA_D1 25 0 1 1 0.040
2022-23 New York University ACHA_D1 25 0 1 1 0.040
2021-22 New York University ACHA_D1 25 0 1 1 0.040

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36751
Forward overall
#2117
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2022-23
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2022-23
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.