← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sidney Pratt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-11-08 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Elite 35 1 10 11 0.314 0.0552 0.0559 0.0720 0.0729
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 18 1 1 2 0.111
2024-25 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 18 1 1 2 0.111
2023-24 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 18 1 1 2 0.111
2022-23 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 18 1 1 2 0.111
2021-22 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 18 1 1 2 0.111
2020-21 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 18 1 1 2 0.111

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
70%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25045
Defenseman overall
#3985
Defenseman born in 2005
#1216
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Olaf · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2010-11
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.