IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shaun Altshuller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-11-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Nepean Raiders CCHL 52 4 6 10 0.192 0.0417 0.0472 0.1488 0.1683
2009-10 Nepean Raiders CCHL 61 6 14 20 0.328 0.0711 0.0771 0.2537 0.2752
2010-11 Nepean Raiders CCHL 59 7 15 22 0.373 0.0809 0.0838 0.2885 0.2987
2011-12 Nepean Raiders CCHL 61 7 22 29 0.475 0.1031 0.1015 0.3678 0.3620
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 29 2 6 8 0.276
2014-15 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 18 1 1 2 0.111
2013-14 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 16 1 1 2 0.125
2012-13 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 25 1 4 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2012-13 · Salve Regina
+147.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40508
Forward overall
#1536
Forward born in 1992
#1091
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erik Cooper
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Shaheen
Hobart · 2013-14
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Petr Miko
Nichols · 2016-17
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.