← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Feemster Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-11-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 33 3 3 6 0.182 0.0720 0.0765 0.1909 0.2028
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 24 0 2 2 0.083
2015-16 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 12 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#21797
Defenseman overall
#2225
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2016-17
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2013-14
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2015-16
0.941 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.