IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kieren Dervin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-31 Country: Canada
2025 · Round 3, Pick #65  ·  Vancouver Canucks Vancouver Canucks
Michigan
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 10 1 2 3 0.300 0.1736 0.1813 0.7709 0.8049
2025-26 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 53 17 25 42 0.792 0.4585 0.4557 2.0363 2.0238
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12661
Forward overall
#321
Forward born in 2007
#595
in OHL

D1 Comparables

John Stevens
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Daniel Milne
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Drew Smolcynski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Randolph
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dave Gust
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nolan Moyle
USHL 2017-18
0.33
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Grant Slukynsky
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.26
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Kyle Kukkonen
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.69
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Daniel Milne
OHL 2012-13
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Bryce Grandbois
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan DiScanio
University of New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.