IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaxon Cover Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-13 Country: Canada
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 London Knights OHL 3 0 2 2 0.667 0.3979 0.4329 1.7269 1.8786
2025-26 London Knights OHL 67 20 32 52 0.776 0.4632 0.4806 2.0103 2.0857
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3523
Forward overall
#45
Forward born in 2008
#479
in OHL

D1 Comparables

John Hayden
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Motte
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Evan Allen
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Kelleher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Vinni Lettieri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.61 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Andrew Kuzma
USHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Ryan Kirwan
USHL 2019-20
0.72
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Brandon Biro
AJHL 2015-16
0.51
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Charlie Cerrato
NTDP-U18 2022-23
1.11
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Anderson
Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Fox
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan DiScanio
New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.