← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaxon Cover Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-13 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 1, Pick #32  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 London Knights OHL 3 0 2 2 0.667 0.3857 0.4196 1.7457 1.8990
2025-26 London Knights OHL 67 20 32 52 0.776 0.4490 0.4658 2.0321 2.1083
2026-27 London Knights OHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.2893 0.2893 1.3092 1.3092
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7395
Forward overall
#72
Forward born in 2008
#389
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Bentley (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2022-23
0.17
actual FR PPG at Penn State
CCHL 2014-15
0.48
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2022-23
0.82
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2017-18
0.38
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2000-01
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John Fisher · 2022-23
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.