← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grady Spicer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-07-17 Country: Canada
Clarkson
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Brockville Braves CCHL 52 8 13 21 0.404 0.0876 0.0996
2025-26 Windsor Spitfires OHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13101
Defenseman overall
#727
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Cornell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Boston University (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston University (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

Clarkson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.07
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.19
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
CCHL 2017-18
0.18
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
USHS-MN 2014-15
0.29
actual FR PPG at Clarkson

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.