IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caleb Malhotra Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-06-02 Country: Canada
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 44 8 18 26 0.591 0.2300 0.2600 0.8617 0.9743
2025-26 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 67 29 55 84 1.254 0.7482 0.7875 3.2473 3.4180
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2169
Forward overall
#24
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Trevor Moore
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Denver (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Anthony Louis
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Miami (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.69 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Kelleher
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Diamantoni
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brendan Harms
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.72 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Kamil Bednarik
NTDP-U18 2023-24
0.47
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Alexander Zetterberg
SHL-J20 2023-24
0.33
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Jeremy Wilmer
NTDP-U18 2020-21
0.86
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Tynan Lawrence
USHL 2025-26
0.39
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.