← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Laravia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 37 4 6 10 0.270 0.0176 0.0176 0.0609 0.0609
2020-21 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 34 12 11 23 0.676 0.0440 0.0440 0.1523 0.1523
2021-22 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 41 5 2 7 0.171 0.0250 0.0253 0.0837 0.0846
2022-23 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 39 2 10 12 0.308 0.0450 0.0431 0.1509 0.1446
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#47147
Forward overall
#3024
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2016-17
0.192 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.