IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Duffy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 30 11 9 20 0.667 0.0765 0.0765 0.1503 0.1503
2021-22 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 39 2 5 7 0.179 0.0415 0.0422 0.0878 0.0892
2022-23 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 41 7 8 15 0.366 0.0845 0.0814 0.1790 0.1725
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 29 6 11 17 0.586
2024-25 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 29 6 11 17 0.586
2023-24 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 29 6 11 17 0.586
2022-23 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 29 6 11 17 0.586
2021-22 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 29 6 11 17 0.586
2020-21 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 29 6 11 17 0.586

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45471
Forward overall
#2882
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Boczar
Endicott · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Myles Kidd
Worcester State · 2024-25
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Dupell
Plymouth State · 2012-13
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.