IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Duffy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 30 11 9 20 0.667 0.0433 0.0433 0.1504 0.1504
2021-22 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 39 2 5 7 0.179 0.0263 0.0267 0.0879 0.0893
2022-23 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 41 7 8 15 0.366 0.0536 0.0517 0.1792 0.1727
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 29 6 11 17 0.586
2024-25 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 29 6 11 17 0.586
2023-24 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 29 6 11 17 0.586
2022-23 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 29 6 11 17 0.586
2021-22 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 29 6 11 17 0.586
2020-21 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 29 6 11 17 0.586

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45309
Forward overall
#2870
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Daniel Dupell
Plymouth State · 2012-13
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathaniel Bannister
Adrian · 2024-25
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Rowland
UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.