IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Dupell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-05-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 56 13 9 22 0.393 0.1444 0.1499 0.4147 0.4304
2011-12 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 59 22 17 39 0.661 0.2429 0.2401 0.6977 0.6898
2012-13 — NAHL 56 14 13 27 0.482 0.1771 0.1662 0.5089 0.4776
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 25 8 17 25 1.000
2015-16 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 23 12 6 18 0.783
2014-15 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 24 7 8 15 0.625
2013-14 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 25 3 6 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2013-14 · Plymouth State
+114.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27027
Forward overall
#1003
Forward born in 1992
#2275
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Mecrones
University of New England · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Casper Dyrssen
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Beer
SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.