IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryerson Edgar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-07-30 Country: Canada
Top 27 — 2027 NHL Draft Prospect
Michigan
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Collingwood Blues OJHL 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.1634 0.1921 0.4589 0.5394
2025-26 Niagara IceDogs OHL 64 23 26 49 0.766 0.4429 0.4918 2.0046 2.2261
2026-27 Niagara IceDogs OHL 7 1 2 3 0.429 0.2479 0.2479 1.1222 1.1222
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7613
Forward overall
#27
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Brandon Salerno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Hudson Fasching
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Moy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Harvard (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average
NCAAe PPG
Joel L'Esperance
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jack Jenkins
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Gavin Best
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Kaden Nelson
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Alex Bump
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.95
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Josh Groll
USHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Brent Wold
Utica · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Kero
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Merrell
University of New England · 2015-16
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.