IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryerson Edgar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-07-30 Country: Canada
Michigan
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Collingwood Blues OJHL 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.1634 0.1921 0.4590 0.5395
2025-26 Niagara IceDogs OHL 64 23 26 49 0.766 0.4429 0.4918 1.9672 2.1846
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7478
Forward overall
#15
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Chris Wilkie
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Larkin
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Michigan (1.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Joe Wegwerth
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jack Eichel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Boston University (1.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wahlin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Michael Pastujov
USHL 2015-16
0.43
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Grant Slukynsky
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.26
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Kyle Kukkonen
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.69
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Dylan Larkin
NTDP-U18 2012-13
1.34
actual FR PPG at Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Aquaro
Hobart · 2016-17
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Anderson
Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Stevens
Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.444 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.