IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Keever Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 39 0 8 8 0.205 0.0133 0.0133 0.0462 0.0462
2020-21 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 32 0 9 9 0.281 0.0183 0.0183 0.0633 0.0633
2021-22 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 42 3 12 15 0.357 0.0232 0.0219 0.0804 0.0758
2022-23 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 46 0 5 5 0.109 0.0159 0.0151 0.0533 0.0506
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 29 1 2 3 0.103
2024-25 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 29 1 2 3 0.103
2023-24 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 29 1 2 3 0.103
2022-23 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 29 1 2 3 0.103
2021-22 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 29 1 2 3 0.103
2020-21 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 29 1 2 3 0.103

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25831
Defenseman overall
#3798
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Kovacs
Gustavus Adolphus · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Anderson
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Thomas
SUNY Brockport · 2002-03
0.160 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.