IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ross Kovacs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-02-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 56 0 7 7 0.125 0.0271 0.0245 0.0968 0.0876
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 20 1 4 5 0.250
2015-16 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 12 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 17 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Gustavus Adolphus D3 — FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#27876
Defenseman overall
#2351
Defenseman born in 1992
#2074
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Yurkins
Aurora · 2018-19
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vito Aluia
Lake Forest · 2014-15
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Pfister
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.