IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Yurkins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 27 7 11 18 0.667 0.2197 0.2136 0.2268 0.2205
2018-19 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 18 2 5 7 0.389 0.1541 0.1435 0.4083 0.3801
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 11 2 0 2 0.182
2021-22 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Aurora D1 — SO 10 1 3 4 0.400
2020-21 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 10 1 3 4 0.400
2019-20 Aurora D1 — FR 18 1 3 4 0.222
2019-20 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 18 1 3 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2019-20 · Aurora
+51.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35761
Forward overall
#1813
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Lazier
Albertus Magnus · 2018-19
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael McChesney
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Emoff
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.