← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quincy Green Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Vermont Academy NE-Prep 27 1 0 1 0.037 0.0073 0.0073 0.0169 0.0169
2021-22 Vermont Academy NE-Prep 26 0 3 3 0.115 0.0229 0.0229 0.0526 0.0526
2022-23 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits EHL 46 2 2 4 0.087 0.0201 0.0196 0.0426 0.0414
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#56837
Forward overall
#3948
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2021-22
0.050 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2011-12
0.160 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2024-25
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.