IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brody Pepoy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-05-16 Country: USA
2026 · Round 6, Pick #169  ·  Toronto Maple Leafs Toronto Maple Leafs
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Saginaw Spirit OHL 67 16 13 29 0.433 0.2504 0.2630 1.1121 1.1680
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21292
Forward overall
#307
Forward born in 2008
#843
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Mike Marnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Frederik Tiffels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Luke Stork
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan McLaughlin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Polino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ RPI (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jacob Fletcher
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.89
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Cade DeStefani
NCDC 2018-19
0.58
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Shane LaVelle
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.20
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Ryan Finnegan
USHL 2014-15
0.69
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexei Filimonov
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
John Barrett
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.