IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brody Pepoy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-05-16 Country: USA
2026 · Round 6, Pick #169  ·  Toronto Maple Leafs Toronto Maple Leafs
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Saginaw Spirit OHL 67 16 13 29 0.433 0.2504 0.2630 1.1332 1.1902
2026-27 Saginaw Spirit OHL 6 2 3 5 0.833 0.4821 0.4821 2.1819 2.1819
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21631
Forward overall
#363
Forward born in 2008
#872
in OHL

D1 Comparables

John Stevens
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sheldon Dries
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Ortega
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
Drew Smolcynski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Hawkins
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cade DeStefani
NCDC 2019-20
0.58
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Louis-Philippe Fontaine
QMJHL 2022-23
0.70
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Kyle Rohrer
NCDC 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Noah Dziver
NAHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Stevens
Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.444 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2022-23
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.