← New Search ↗ Social Card

Harrison Bylin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-05-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Lawrenceville School NE-Prep 29 1 6 7 0.241 0.0478 0.0478 0.1100 0.1100
2022-23 Lawrenceville School NE-Prep 23 1 3 4 0.174 0.0344 0.0344 0.0792 0.0792
2023-24 New Jersey Bears EHL 41 4 11 15 0.366 0.0845 0.0857 0.1790 0.1816
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New York University ACHA_D1 24 1 11 12 0.500
2024-25 New York University ACHA_D1 24 1 11 12 0.500
2023-24 New York University ACHA_D1 24 1 11 12 0.500
2022-23 New York University ACHA_D1 24 1 11 12 0.500
2021-22 New York University ACHA_D1 24 1 11 12 0.500
2020-21 New York University ACHA_D1 24 1 11 12 0.500

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18808
Defenseman overall
#3363
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.