IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alec Schwab Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-05-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Soo Eagles NOJHL 49 3 19 22 0.449 0.0750 0.0730 0.1869 0.1820
2019-20 Chippewa Steel NAHL 40 2 5 7 0.175 0.0643 0.0643 0.1847 0.1847
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 20 0 3 3 0.150
2022-23 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 26 1 1 2 0.077
2021-22 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 8 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Aurora D1 NCHA FR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19523
Defenseman overall
#2983
Defenseman born in 1999
#5722
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tony DeVito
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Weissler
Wilkes · 2023-24
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Johnson
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.