IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vladimir Provorov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-09 Country: Russia
Ohio State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Sudbury Wolves OHL 67 7 18 25 0.373 0.2158 0.2238 0.9769 1.0130
2026-27 Sudbury Wolves OHL 6 2 4 6 1.000 0.5785 0.5785 2.6184 2.6184
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26330
Forward overall
#459
Forward born in 2008
#974
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Nathan Walker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Marian (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Frank Vatrano
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Suess
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG
Peter Quenneville
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Ohio State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Sam McCormick
USHL 2015-16
0.21
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
Ronnie Hein
USHL 2015-16
0.69
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
Noah Powell
USHL 2023-24
0.29
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
Jake Rozzi
USHL 2022-23
0.36
actual FR PPG at Ohio State

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Reifler
Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sascha Figi
Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.