IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ville Bodin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-09 Country: Sweden
Curry
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Express Hockey Club EHL 46 26 25 51 1.109 0.2561 0.2621 0.5425 0.5552
2025-26 Express Hockey Club EHL 50 52 38 90 1.800 0.4158 0.4020 0.8807 0.8514
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
65%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5174
Forward overall
#144
Forward born in 2005
#15
in EHL

D1 Comparables

A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Curry Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Adam Valadao
0.73
actual FR PPG at Curry
R.J. Kleiman
0.62
actual FR PPG at Curry
Andrew Morton
0.83
actual FR PPG at Curry
Ross Enmark
1.31
actual FR PPG at Curry

D2/3 Comparables

Tyson Gilmour
SUNY Geneseo · 2018-19
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Hoover
Lebanon Valley · 2022-23
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Bates
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.