IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Haldane Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-16 Country: USA
Castleton
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 H.C. Rhode Island EHL 27 11 19 30 1.111 0.2567 0.2630 0.5437 0.5569
2025-26 H.C. Rhode Island EHL 48 27 27 54 1.125 0.2599 0.2515 0.5505 0.5327
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9722
Forward overall
#409
Forward born in 2005
#90
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Castleton Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cody Ayers
0.57
actual FR PPG at Castleton
Kevin Van Dyk
0.70
actual FR PPG at Castleton
Dom Kuziak
0.44
actual FR PPG at Castleton
Jeremy Hilliard
0.50
actual FR PPG at Castleton

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Gerum
Salve Regina · 2024-25
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake McKenelly
Wentworth · 2017-18
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Walker
Albertus Magnus · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.