IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Murata Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-02-15 Country: Canada
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Flint Firebirds OHL 59 5 13 18 0.305 0.1765 0.1920 0.7840 0.8529
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32091
Forward overall
#140
Forward born in 2009
#1100
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Jared Fiegl
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Pavelek
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Michael Booth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston College (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Snively
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Liam Pecararo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Maine (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Gavin Best
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Tiernan Shoudy
USHL 2018-19
0.32
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Dylan Pavelek
USHL 2012-13
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Mitchell Mattson
USHS-MN 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

Jax Murray
Trinity · 2015-16
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kim Hilmersson
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Holmers
Aurora · 2014-15
1.053 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.