← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alec Osher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 New Jersey 87's EHLP 36 2 11 13 0.361 0.0414 0.0435 0.0814 0.0856
2023-24 New Jersey 87's EHLP 15 0 7 7 0.467 0.0535 0.0510 0.1052 0.1002
2024-25 New Jersey 87's EHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 27 5 10 15 0.556
2024-25 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 27 5 10 15 0.556
2023-24 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 27 5 10 15 0.556
2022-23 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 27 5 10 15 0.556
2021-22 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 27 5 10 15 0.556
2020-21 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 27 5 10 15 0.556

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9785
Defenseman overall
#2133
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wesleyan · 2022-23
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2017-18
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.